|
Post by Maestro on May 14, 2006 21:18:48 GMT 5.5
Dear members
As u all know we have the members ranking system based on no post.. The current members ranking system is
Post Required : Rank name 0 : New member 10 : Junior Member 100 : Full member 500 : Senior Member 1000 : SpicyFlavours Addicted 4000 : God
We looking for New ranking system. or modifying this system As you are also a part of Spicy Flavours , we request u all to come up with new Ranking terminology ..any suggestion or idea u have will be highly appreciated.
Looking for ur suggestions....
Please note the final decision will be of Team Spicy Flavours. Thanks for ur wonderful support Team Spicy Flavours
|
|
|
Post by kuchu on May 16, 2006 17:39:46 GMT 5.5
you can also give some points on each good post posted by the member, although u have given an option of exalt and smite but its totaly on the likings or wish of the viewer . or either u can give a voting option for a new thread and according to the votes u can give a different ranking , mean to say the current ranking is ok , u can also start it like example: full member leutinent or full member major , u can do this in each category and the member will carry on the same rank even ii he is moving to the next stage by no of post.
i wish u will like the suggestion
thanks pradeep
|
|
|
Post by oooooooo on Jun 6, 2006 10:48:17 GMT 5.5
disgusting
|
|
|
Post by oooooooo on Jun 6, 2006 10:53:25 GMT 5.5
i was just kidding when i said that.this rating system is good but many people who were just idling away on the pc post things which are of minimum content and use.so,this rating system should encourage people to showcase their talent instead of just earning titles like addicted to spicy or for god's sake"GOD".
|
|
|
Post by Saurabh Jain on Jun 17, 2006 18:26:03 GMT 5.5
Guys still waiting for ur ideas pld do write something suggest me yaar
|
|
|
Post by indiangurl on Jun 18, 2006 15:42:50 GMT 5.5
dude..how abt takin rankings of the police? like cadet, officer, captain, commander, raider, undercover agent, etc..
|
|
|
Post by kuchu on Jun 19, 2006 13:15:43 GMT 5.5
its a real good sugesstion , but why u change ur old ranking system without prior notice as god ranking was on 3000 posts now u did it on 4000 . this is not good
|
|
|
Post by indiangurl on Jun 21, 2006 17:40:03 GMT 5.5
ya saurabh..
atleast u shud change the number or posts..
Post Required : Rank name 0 : New member 100 : Junior Member 500 : Full member 1000 : Senior Member 2500 : SpicyFlavours Addicted 4000 : God
this seems more appropriate...wat say?
|
|
|
Post by Saurabh Jain on Jun 21, 2006 22:18:49 GMT 5.5
ya saurabh.. atleast u shud change the number or posts.. Post Required : Rank name 0 : New member 100 : Junior Member 500 : Full member 1000 : Senior Member 2500 : SpicyFlavours Addicted 4000 : God this seems more appropriate...wat say? I personally feel that ur corect but thing is there r lots of members for whom getting first 100 post is not easy and so to just get 2 stars quickly is the thing taht come in attarction from 1 star to star hope we will come up with new ideas soon good day
|
|
|
Post by Saurabh Jain on Jan 17, 2008 22:40:14 GMT 5.5
come up guys.................
|
|
|
Post by kuchu on Mar 13, 2008 10:16:26 GMT 5.5
what about after achieving 5000 posts
|
|